Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (2024)

Sort by:

Newest Oldest

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (1)

Tharavn66

Rating: 5 stars

07/18/2017

Consistently delicious. It could do with a little less sugar. I reduced granulated sugar to 3/4 cup. I could even use less. Definitely add a Tbsp of instant coffee. I baked it in a glass dish lined with al foil. I had to bake it atleast five minutes longer.

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (2)

jopalis

Rating: 5 stars

10/07/2016

These little brownies are fabulous. I didn't want the tedium of slicing into 20 so made them in mini muffin pans. Bake time about 15 min but check so don't overbake. Also be sure to either use a little paper for mini muffin pan or grease well enough. Mine stuck a little... I stuck cooled ones in freezer for 30 min. ran knife around and popped them out. I weighed the flour and sugars and cocoa. In fact, I did them in grams. No biggie. Conversion chart on King Arthur flour if you need it. They are lightly crunchy/chewy outside and inside delicious chocolately goodness. Not too cakey and not too wet! I got 32 @ 115 cal each!! Plan to top with 1/2 serving slow churned ice cream for 50 cal. more.Freeze some.Yum, the right little bite of sweetness!

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (3)

jmeleeS

Rating: 4 stars

05/29/2014

At first I thought I did something "wrong" because while my batter looked correct before I baked these babies, they would NOT set in the oven (I think my total cook time rang in to the tune of 35-40 min total). I finally just removed them and hoped for the best since the edges were getting done and the top started to get that nice crackle on top. While the middle of the brownies acted more like a lava fudge cake (oh so ooey, gooey), my husband and I could not get enough of these brownies. The whole pan was gone in just a few days and I would always think about these treats after dinner to top off my meal. These will honestly disappear when you make them. Next time I plan to up my flour to ~1 cup to see if they set better (I also didn't add nuts; I don't care for them in brownies). Other than that, can't complain about this recipe - so chocolately, so delicious. Enjoy!

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (4)

iampell

Rating: 5 stars

05/07/2014

Some of the best brownies I've ever eaten in my life. Definitely worth making over and over again.

Rating: 5 stars

04/08/2014

I make these brownies at least once a month. Seriously. It's a really easy recipe, and they taste spectacular. You can share these if you really want to, but I usually don't! Just a couple notes on comments I've seen in other reviews: 1. Even if you use the pan the recipe calls for, you still might need more time. I bake mine from 24-26 minutes each time in a metal 8x8 pan. 2. I bake them for the longer time if my batter is more liquidy. My normal batter is extremely thick. Make sure you don't use any more than the milk called for, and accurately measure the dry ingredients to get the best consistency. 3. Never be afraid to add more chocolate chips. I measure them out, kind of, but...then I add some more. I don't measure the nuts. I just pour in what I want. 4. I use pecans instead of walnuts because walnuts are expensive and I get pecans for free from pecan trees. 5. I firmly believe that slightly underdone brownies are always better than dry ones. Gooey but baked is best, though.

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (6)

rhiannonkatieri

Rating: 5 stars

01/19/2013

Sweet holy chocolate! Is it still light if I eat the whole pan? I needed to cook it for more like 35 min before it stopped being jiggly, but maybe my oven was off. I will investigate. I am super picky about my brownies. They need to be moist and dense and super chocolatey. I actually won't get brownies from most restaurants since they don't fit the bill, and I think box brownies tend to have horrible fake chocolate and overwhelming vanilla notes. These were perfect.

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (7)

crusnock

Rating: 5 stars

09/02/2012

These were amazing! Super-fudgy, just the way I like my brownies! I made a few minor tweaks: semi-sweet chocolate chunks (only ones I could find), 1% milk (what I had on-hand), and I chopped the walnuts very finely, sprinkling them all on top instead of mixing some in. I did have to bake for at least 25 minutes, and the toothpick never came out clean, because they are so fudgy, but I didn't want to over-bake them, since I don't like dry brownies.

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (8)

JanienePape

Rating: 4 stars

08/07/2012

The brownies were delicious, no question. They are 4 points per portion in weight watchers, which of course is great, however, the portion is very small. It is the same size as those one bite brownies you might get at the super market. So you eat your one bite and then stare really hard at the plate since you want to gobble the remaining portions immediately! I would agree with the other reviewers. Even though the batter appears sufficiently moist there is a problem with the directions. It specifically notes that the expected cooking time is 22 minutes. You are suppose to test it with a tooth pick and it should come out basically dry with some crumbs sticking to it. If you wait for this result, it will be dry and crumbly, and it will take at least double the amount of time to get there. I think the key is what others realized, cook it a little longer then the directions specify, like about 10 minutes and regardless of what the toothpick looks like, pull them out.

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (9)

CEBedford

Rating: 5 stars

07/21/2012

These are the best brownies ever! I only had a 8-inch square glass baking dish, so like other reviewers said, I had to bake an extra 20 minutes or so. I added 1 Tbsp of instant espresso powder to the chocolate and milk before microwaving. Complements the chocolate flavor without a noticeable coffee taste.

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (10)

mgk3ohio

Rating: 1 stars

06/09/2012

This is a horrible recipe and probably one of the worst ones I've tried from CL. I totally agree with the reviewers who said this was way too dry. It was like dry crumbles and I followed the recipe exactly. This was a waste of time and ingredients. I will not make again.

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (11)

DecaturCook

Rating: 2 stars

04/12/2012

I wish I read the reviews below before I made this. I baked for 10 extra minutes and still way underdone. When I checked to see if it was done, I assumed the chocolate on the knife was from the melted chocolate chunks - instead it was not cooked all the way. Please Cooking Light, correct the baking time on this recipe!

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (12)

susiesue

Rating: 5 stars

03/28/2012

Insanely good - cooked brownies an extra five minutes, turned out perfectly!

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (13)

ediblediaries

Rating: 1 stars

03/15/2012

I have never commented on a recipe but this was the WORST. So so dry!!! I don't understand...and I am a chef!

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (14)

Beccaroo73

Rating: 5 stars

02/29/2012

These were super yummy! Like another posted said, I had to bake them quite a bit longer than the recipe called for. I baked for an extra 20 minutes and they were still not done, however I had to leave the house, so just took them out and let them sit for about 8 hours, and they were fine. I used pecans on top instead of mixing in walnuts, and they were great--had a nice toasted flavor. I live in a foreign country were Betty Crocker brownie mix is $16, so I'll definitely be making these again!

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (15)

donnaandrez

Rating: 5 stars

02/23/2012

Best Brownies I ever made!

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (16)

acureese

Rating: 5 stars

02/13/2012

Delicious! Note: I had to bake them much longer to make them hard enough, even 25 mins was too gooey- needed 30+. My oven usually requires a few extra minutes, but not this much. Just an fyi if you're on a time constraint, otherwise MAKE THEM!! Sooo good! :)

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (17)

goddess63

Rating: 2 stars

02/12/2012

Ok, I'm experienced at baking, know enough about what I'm doing, and I followed this recipe. But instead of a brownie I ended up with something more like a very dry cake--NOT a brownie AT ALL. How did everyone else end up with an actual brownie? Although it tastes very good--as a brownie should taste like--I just wouldn't make this again unless there was a way to make it more brownie-like. I feel like this was a giant waste of my time and ingredients and am overall very disappointed.

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (18)

jenjw4

Rating: 5 stars

02/10/2012

I followed the recipe, but added about a 1/4 teaspoon of instant coffee to the melted butter and roasted the walnuts in the microwave. An hour or so after baking, I ate a bite and was worried they were under done, but I think it was just that the mixed in chips are still melted. Today they were fine.

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (19)

cookingjennaloo

Rating: 5 stars

02/06/2012

These are the BEST brownies ever!!!!!! They are so rich and chocolately :) They were very easy to make, but since my husband doesn't like nuts in his brownies I left out the walnuts. I don't have a metal 9x9 pan, so I used my glass 8x8. It took longer to bake, but they were well worth the wait! This is a definite keeper of a recipe!

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (20)

bvanduyne

Rating: 5 stars

01/10/2012

Wow! These brownies are the best I've ever tasted. Very rich and chocolaty!

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (21)

PatriciaH6911

Rating: 5 stars

01/01/2012

Wow! This has to be the most decadent brownie ever! Ooey, gooey goodness in every bite. Followed recipe exactly, wouldn't change a thing!

Classic Fudge-Walnut Brownies Recipe (2024)

FAQs

What's the difference between brownies and fudge brownies? ›

Brownies have a cake-like texture with a crispy top and a moist, fudgy center and are typically baked in a rectangular pan. Fudge, on the other hand, is typically made by cooking a mixture of sugar, butter, and milk or cream until it reaches a soft, chewy consistency.

What are Katharine Hepburn brownies? ›

The brownies are made with unsweetened chocolate, which is also known as baking, plain or bitter chocolate. It is chocolate in its rawest form and this means that unsweetened chocolate is just ground cocoa nibs that have been refined and contain between 50-55% cocoa butter (cacao fat).

How to make fudgy brownies vs cakey brownies? ›

Fudgy brownies have a higher fat-to-flour ratio than cakey ones. So add more fat—in this case, butter and chocolate. A cakey batch has more flour and relies on baking powder for leavening. The amount of sugar and eggs does not change whether you're going fudgy or cakey.

Did Little Debbie stop making walnut brownies? ›

McKee Foods owner of Little Debbie has recently decided to discontinue the Fudge Brownies with English Walnuts.

What is the old version of brownies? ›

Did you know that Brownies were originally called 'Rosebuds'? Rosebuds was established in 1914 for girls to join before they became Guides. Just one year later, the name was changed to Brownies. Brownies are the second-youngest members of the Girlguiding family, for girls aged between 7 and 10.

What makes brownies more moist? ›

One change is to use milk or heavy cream instead of water. This change will make brownies more moist and gooey since milk is more fatty and flavorful than water. A second change is to use butter instead of oil. For similar reasons to using milk, butter adds a rich and more decadent quality to the batter.

Why are they called blonde brownies? ›

The name 'blondies' comes from their light color, which contrasts with the dark color of traditional brownies.

What is a New York brownie? ›

Description. The classic brownie. Rich, moist, soft, chewy and filled with white choc chunks of deliciousness. Vegetarian • No artificial flavours • No artificial colours • No added preservatives • Certified Halal PORTION GUIDE: Approx 20 – 30 portions | SHELF LIFE: Room Temp: 28 Days.

Why is brownies changing their name? ›

Canada Girl Guides renamed Brownies, new name Embers meant to be more inclusive The new name, Embers, was approved overwhelmingly by members and is meant to be more inclusive. Past and present Girl Guides said the old name caused harm and even prevented or delayed their joining.

What is a brownie fairy? ›

brownie, in English and Scottish folklore, a small, industrious fairy or hobgoblin believed to inhabit houses and barns. Rarely seen, he was often heard at night, cleaning and doing housework; he also sometimes mischievously disarranged rooms.

What is the number one brownie mix? ›

Pillsbury Chocolate Fudge Brownie Mix

Even if you are in the market for a solid block of fudgy goodness, this is more than enjoyable. And it's definitely the best brownie mix brand if you love a cakey brownie.

How to make box brownie mix better? ›

When the back-of-box instructions call for water, try some instant espresso or strong-brewed coffee for roasty, toasty notes that pair impeccably with chocolate. Or use milk or half-and-half for even more richness. And for cakey instead of fudgy brownies, add an extra egg for more lift and spring.

What family owns Little Debbie? ›

McKee Foods Corporation is a privately held and family-owned American snack food and granola manufacturer headquartered in Collegedale, Tennessee. The corporation is the maker of Drake's Cakes, Fieldstone Bakery snacks and cereal, Little Debbie snacks, and Sunbelt Bakery granola and cereal.

What is the oldest Little Debbie cake? ›

After its initial introduction, more than 14 million cakes were sold within 10 months. While the Oatmeal Creme Pie was the original Little Debbie snack cake, there were 14 different varieties by 1964 including the ever-popular Nutty Buddy® Wafer Bars and Swiss Cake Roll.

What is the best selling Little Debbie snacks? ›

While you might think Swiss Rolls took the cake, Fudge Rounds were found to be the most popular Little Debbie snack in the country, taking the top spot in 13 states. Surprisingly, Swiss Rolls were the most popular in only one state: Michigan.

Are my brownies fudgy or raw? ›

It's useful to know that the internal temperature of a regular cake should read 210°F for moist-but-not-fudgy fluffiness. So fudgy, gooey brownies will be done at around 165°F while cakey brownies will be done at around 210°F. The higher the temperature, the more cakey your brownies will be.

What's the difference between fudgy and undercooked brownies? ›

Want to make sure that your brownies are still fudgy but not raw? The truth is, fudgy brownies are slightly undercooked. The key is to make sure the center of the brownies is set and that the toothpick doesn't look too gooey when you remove it from the brownies.

Why are they called S * * * * * brownies? ›

The Londoner describes why they called them "slu*tty brownies" perfectly: "they're oh so easy, and more than a little bit filthy." Just as simple as I would've imagined. They are as easy to make as they are messy to eat. If you look up slu*tty Brownies on Pinterest there are thousands of recipes listed.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Edwin Metz

Last Updated:

Views: 6120

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (78 voted)

Reviews: 85% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Edwin Metz

Birthday: 1997-04-16

Address: 51593 Leanne Light, Kuphalmouth, DE 50012-5183

Phone: +639107620957

Job: Corporate Banking Technician

Hobby: Reading, scrapbook, role-playing games, Fishing, Fishing, Scuba diving, Beekeeping

Introduction: My name is Edwin Metz, I am a fair, energetic, helpful, brave, outstanding, nice, helpful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.